Re: Coverity Open Source Defect Scan of Emacs

[Jason Rumney]

Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> For example, what sort of bugs does your product find,
IIRC, the most notable bugs found by the Stanford project that I assume 
this is based on were in the MS Windows port, where malformed system 
messages could theoretically be used to make Emacs do things it 
shouldn't. This was not a remote exploit, and would not give the 
attacker any privileges it did not already have as far as I could tell.