[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PURESIZE increased (again)
From: |
Reiner Steib |
Subject: |
Re: PURESIZE increased (again) |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Apr 2006 19:25:53 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110005 (No Gnus v0.5) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Fri, Apr 28 2006, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> From: Andreas Schwab <address@hidden>
[...]
>> The padding used by pure_alloc depends on USE_LSB_TAG, which may explain
>> the difference.
>
> Thanks.
>
> But this will only explain the difference if Reiner says that he
> disabled USE_LSB_TAG (which AFAIK is on by default on x86_64 GNU/Linux
> systems). I simply built the checked-out tree, so my value of
> USE_LSB_TAG should be the default.
I did the same. gdb_use_lsb is 1 on both archs when printed in gdb:
(gdb) p gdb_use_lsb
$1 = 1
Bye, Reiner.
--
,,,
(o o)
---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- | PGP key available | http://rsteib.home.pages.de/
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), (continued)
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Luc Teirlinck, 2006/04/27
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Ken Raeburn, 2006/04/27
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Luc Teirlinck, 2006/04/27
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Ken Raeburn, 2006/04/27
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Andreas Schwab, 2006/04/28
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/28
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again),
Reiner Steib <=
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Luc Teirlinck, 2006/04/27
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Ken Raeburn, 2006/04/27
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), David Kastrup, 2006/04/27
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Ken Raeburn, 2006/04/27
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/28
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/28
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), David Kastrup, 2006/04/28
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Ken Raeburn, 2006/04/28
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/28
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Reiner Steib, 2006/04/27