Re: PURESIZE increased (again)

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>,  address@hidden
> From: David Kastrup <address@hidden>
> Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 00:38:34 +0200
> 
> Not necessarily.  Most filenames are written to accommodate 8+3. so if
> we have 12345678.el\0, this is twelve bytes.  The same with .elc might
> require sixteen bytes after alignment.

As I wrote elsewhere, we need to explain several KB per .elc file, so
a few bytes of difference won't do, even if the file names are stored.