Re: line-move-partial too costly ?

[Michaël Cadilhac]

Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:

> address@hidden (Michaël Cadilhac) writes:
>> I don't think my computer, with an Athlon XP 2000+, is too old to not
>> be concerned by Emacs user-friendliness :-)
>>
>> With emacs -Q, if I entirely  fill the scratch buffer (150 columns, 75
>> lines) and then  press C-n and _stay on it_,[1]  the cursor is blocked
>> at the second line. When C-n is released, Emacs responds only after
>> a second or so.
>
> Something seems very strange -- I'm on a slower computer than you, but
> see absolutely no slowdown in the above scenario....  This is true
> whether I use -q or not.

Thanks for testing! Did you use a particular keyboard rate? With the
default X one, I don't have this problem.

-- 
/!\ My mail address changed, please update your files accordingly.
 |      Michaël `Micha' Cadilhac   |  Isn't vi that text editor with        |
 |         Epita/LRDE Promo 2007   |   two modes... One that beeps and      |
 |  http://michael.cadilhac.name   |     one that corrupts your file?       |
 `--  -   JID: address@hidden --'           -- Dan Jacobson         -  --'

pgpqNA01yLVdm.pgp
Description: PGP signature