Re: Quote file name args to start-process-shell-command?

[Stefan Monnier]

> I agree with the gist of your patch which removes the confusion about
> the args.

> But it does this only in the doc string, not the code itself.  This
> gives the function "hidden" backwards compatibility.

> I don't think that is really a good idea: I think the code should
> follow suit.

Well, I guess the docstring should do like the `sit-for' does, and mention
the old calling convention and mention that it's deprecated.


        Stefan