|
From: | Jason Rumney |
Subject: | Re: Port of Emacs client / server programs to Windows NT |
Date: | Sat, 28 Oct 2006 10:28:09 +0100 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) |
That might have been important 10 years ago, but now I doubt there are any installations of Windows 95 without the networking addon used by Emacs users.- It doesn't require Winsock.
Maybe a week ago it would have been worth it, but not now that Juanma has completed his work.Would it be worth making the code in server.el resort back to running a separate process if the :local sockets are not supported?
It might be worth adding cross-platform support for named pipes after the release.Or maybe Emacs could be made to use named pipes instead of sockets if a :local socket is created on Windows as they seem to be the Windows equivalent of Unix domain sockets?
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |