[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time
From: |
Stuart D. Herring |
Subject: |
Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time |
Date: |
Thu, 1 Mar 2007 08:54:21 -0800 (PST) |
User-agent: |
SquirrelMail/1.4.8-2.el3.7lanl |
> Actually, a better test would be to put
>
> (if (zerop (random 1)) (setq jit-lock-stealth-time nil))
>
> in your .emacs. And then check the value of jit-lock-stealth-time every
> time you notice a delay (after which, you'll want to restart jit-lock,
> which basically means restart Emacs).
>
> This should bring the experiment a bit closer to the "double blind"
> gold standard.
Remember to seed your random number generator first! (random t) is your
friend.
Davis
--
This product is sold by volume, not by mass. If it appears too dense or
too sparse, it is because mass-energy conversion has occurred during
shipping.
Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/03/03