Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time

[David Kastrup]

Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:

>     I mostly use very fast (3 Ghz) machines nowadays, which are not easily
>     forced into annoying delays.  I could try to find a slower machine,
>     but I need to know what is the clock speed we consider as
>     ``reference'' for such investigations.  That is, with what slow clock
>     speeds we would still like Emacs to be reasonably responsive?
>
> I don't know.  I have not kept track of things like that for 15 years.
>
> But I think that if NONE of the developers now finds this annoying,
> that problem will be rare enough that it doesn't count for much.
>
> So we can set jit-lock-stealth-time to nil.
>
> Would someone please do that?

I have done that and changed the NEWS entry accordingly, too.

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum