Re: diff-apply-hunk documentation doesn't match implementation

[Andreas Schwab]

Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:

> E.g. was it just that the patch happened to use the same name for the old
> tree as a tree you happened to have lying around?  Or was the name identical
> precisely because that was the old tree you passed to `diff' to generate
> the patch?

I did not generate the patch.  If you look closer you'll see that the
patch was generated against a different tree, and the naming convention
just happend to match the convention I use for my work.  Perhaps
diff-find-source-location is too smart of its own good? :-)

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, address@hidden
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."