[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lispref Timer section
|
From: |
Richard Stallman |
|
Subject: |
Re: lispref Timer section |
|
Date: |
Fri, 30 Mar 2007 17:22:09 -0400 |
Do I misunderstand, or is the section "Timers for Delayed Execution"
in the lispref totally misleading when it speaks about absolute values
for TIME in run-at-time? It claims that "Absolute times may be
specified in a wide variety of formats", but this seems false.
It is supposed to be true, so I think this is a bug.
When was it coded to use such a narrow range of formats?