Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence

[Davis Herring]

> It seems easier, but in fact to DTRT according to the documentation
> above means dropping support for Windows 95, 98 and ME, and modifying
> ALL system messages to use Unicode, which is major work. I think it is
> worth doing that for Emacs 22, because Windows 98 and ME are almost dead
> now, and probably will be by the time Emacs 22 s released, and also with
> the change of Emacs' internal representation, Unicode fits better. But
> now I think the best approach for this problem is to add an entry to
> PROBLEMS and get on with the release.

Just to be certain:
Surely you mean 23 instead of 22, especially with the mention of Unicode?

Davis

-- 
This product is sold by volume, not by mass.  If it appears too dense or
too sparse, it is because mass-energy conversion has occurred during
shipping.