Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence

[Richard Stallman]

    > It seems easier, but in fact to DTRT according to the documentation 
    > above means dropping support for Windows 95, 98 and ME, and modifying 
    > ALL system messages to use Unicode, which is major work. I think it is 
    > worth doing that for Emacs 22, because Windows 98 and ME are almost dead 
    > now, and probably will be by the time Emacs 22 s released, and also with 
    > the change of Emacs' internal representation, Unicode fits better.

    I added an entry to etc/TODO based on this.

As I've already said, I think this change would probably be a bad
thing.  People can try it and see whether it works well enough
on the old Windows versions.  But if it doesn't, I think it should
not be installed.