[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Using empty_string as the only "" string
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Using empty_string as the only "" string |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:52:14 -0400 |
The issue is about null strings. Non-null strings should
not be canonicalized because you can change the elements and text
properties in them.
Handa wrote:
You can modify the multibyteness of an empty string, and a
unibyte empty string and a multibyte empty string behave a
little bit differently, for instance, when concatinated with
an unibyte 8-bit string.
Thus, there would need to be two canonical null strings,
one unibyte and one multibyte.
- Re: Using empty_string as the only "" string, (continued)
- Re: Using empty_string as the only "" string, Miles Bader, 2007/04/24
- Re: Using empty_string as the only "" string, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/04/24
- Re: Using empty_string as the only "" string, Miles Bader, 2007/04/24
- Re: Using empty_string as the only "" string, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/04/24
- Re: Using empty_string as the only "" string, Miles Bader, 2007/04/24
- Re: Using empty_string as the only "" string, Johan Bockgård, 2007/04/24
- Re: Using empty_string as the only "" string, Miles Bader, 2007/04/24
- Re: Using empty_string as the only "" string,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Using empty_string as the only "" string, Daniel Brockman, 2007/04/26
- Re: Using empty_string as the only "" string, Richard Stallman, 2007/04/27
- Re: Using empty_string as the only "" string, Richard Stallman, 2007/04/24
- Re: Using empty_string as the only "" string, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/04/25
Re: Using empty_string as the only "" string, Richard Stallman, 2007/04/24
Re: Using empty_string as the only "" string, Stefan Monnier, 2007/04/24
Re: Using empty_string as the only "" string, Richard Stallman, 2007/04/24
Re: using empty_string as the only "" string, dmantipov, 2007/04/25