Re: Using empty_string as the only "" string

[Daniel Brockman]

Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:

> Thus, there would need to be two canonical null strings,
> one unibyte and one multibyte.

Then what happens if you try to modify the multibyteness of
one of those canonical null strings?  Does the function that
performs this modification return a (possibly) new string?

-- 
Daniel Brockman <address@hidden>