[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: about the byte-opt.el patch
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: about the byte-opt.el patch |
Date: |
Fri, 06 Jul 2007 12:50:05 +0300 |
> From: Thien-Thi Nguyen <address@hidden>
> Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2007 22:46:46 +0200
> Cc: Feng Li <address@hidden>, address@hidden
>
> the latest Makefile.in (which does chmod +w on those files),
Is this change really a good idea? It defeats the purpose of CVSREAD,
doesn't it? Perhaps it is better to change autoload.el so that it can
update even read-only files, and preserve the read-only attribute of a
file after it's finished updating its autoload cookies. WDYT?
- about the byte-opt.el patch, Feng Li, 2007/07/04
- Re: about the byte-opt.el patch, Richard Stallman, 2007/07/05
- Re: about the byte-opt.el patch, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2007/07/05
- File-specific autoloads (was: about the byte-opt.el patch), Eli Zaretskii, 2007/07/06
- Re: File-specific autoloads, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2007/07/06
- Re: File-specific autoloads, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/07/06
- Re: File-specific autoloads, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2007/07/06
- Re: File-specific autoloads, Stefan Monnier, 2007/07/06
- Re: File-specific autoloads, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/07/07
- Re: File-specific autoloads, Stefan Monnier, 2007/07/07
- Re: File-specific autoloads, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/07/07