[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Split man directory
From: |
Glenn Morris |
Subject: |
Re: Split man directory |
Date: |
Mon, 03 Sep 2007 14:42:19 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) |
Richard Stallman wrote:
> I'd create a new directory emacsref and leave the rest of the
> manuals in man.
>
> Since the Emacs Manual is the main manual for Emacs, and the others
> are secondary, I'd rather do it as I said before.
It's only a directory name, what difference does it make? The "man"
directory is confusingly named, IMO, because it has nothing to do with
the traditional Unix "man" directory. It doesn't even contain sources
for man pages.
emacsref/man/doc and miscref/man/doc?
- Re: Split man directory, (continued)
Re: Split man directory, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/09/01
Re: Split man directory, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/01
- Re: Split man directory, Glenn Morris, 2007/09/01
- Re: Split man directory, Andreas Schwab, 2007/09/02
- Re: Split man directory, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/03
- Re: Split man directory,
Glenn Morris <=
- Re: Split man directory, Ralf Angeli, 2007/09/03
- Re: Split man directory, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/09/03
- Re: Split man directory, Leo, 2007/09/03
- Re: Split man directory, David Kastrup, 2007/09/03
- Re: Split man directory, Stefan Monnier, 2007/09/04
- Re: Split man directory, David Kastrup, 2007/09/04
- Re: Split man directory, Stephen Berman, 2007/09/04
- Re: Split man directory, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/04
- Re: Split man directory, Miles Bader, 2007/09/04
Re: Split man directory, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/04