Re: New VC appears ready for merge

[Dan Nicolaescu]

"Eric S. Raymond" <address@hidden> writes:

  > Dan, I'd appreciate getting a green light from you within the next
  > couple of days.  I want to get to work on the post-merge issues
  > (including your "No fileset is available" gripelet, speeding up
  > VC-Dired, and the terminology cleanup) but right now I don't want to
  > do anything that will cause new VC to diverge more from CVS head.

Please add a changelog entry for vc-switch-backend. 

This got recently merged in, so please update your version:

@@ -66,8 +64,8 @@
 ;; This mode is fully documented in the Emacs user's manual.
 ;;
 ;; Supported version-control systems presently include CVS, RCS, GNU
-;; Arch, Subversion, Bzr, Mercurial, Meta-CVS, and SCCS (or its free
-;; replacement, CSSC).
+;; Arch, Subversion, Bzr, Git, Mercurial, Meta-CVS, Monotone and SCCS
+;; (or its free replacement, CSSC).

Other than that, I don't see any stoppers.

Thank you for the patient way of handling this.