Re: bruce.el

[David Hansen]

On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 05:57:18 -0500 Richard Stallman wrote:

>     That I can understand. What I don't understand (there's no need for
>     you to take the time to explain it to me) is why, in addition to that,
>     you had to copy spook.el to bruce.el and s/spook/bruce.
>
> spook.el inserts keywords that spies might get distracted by.
> bruce.el is supposed to insert indecent words.
>
> Also, bruce.el contains an explanation of what it is about,
> totally different from that in spook.el.
>
>     sufficient to remove the spook data file,
>
> There was no need to do anything to the spook data file.
> (But maybe someone should update it now.)

Should "TWAT" (The War Against Terrorism) go into spook.lines or
bruce.lines?  This thing turned out to be pretty indecent, so I vote for
bruce.lines.

David