[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: position on changing defaults?
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: position on changing defaults? |
Date: |
Fri, 07 Mar 2008 18:14:20 -0500 |
You also need to handle the case where you have use shifted arrow
to mark the region, and then use an unshifted arrow ... which should
deactivate the mark.
It seems like a simpler solution would be to have special events
like <shift-down> <shift-up> <meta-down> <meta-up> etc....
Why not just bind the shifted and unshifted arrow keys to new commands?
We only need 8 of them.
- Re: position on changing defaults?, (continued)
- Re: position on changing defaults?, Chong Yidong, 2008/03/05
- Re: position on changing defaults?, Miles Bader, 2008/03/05
- Re: position on changing defaults?, Juri Linkov, 2008/03/05
- Re: position on changing defaults?, Kim F. Storm, 2008/03/06
- Re: position on changing defaults?,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: position on changing defaults?, Miles Bader, 2008/03/07
- Re: position on changing defaults?, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/03/07
- Re: position on changing defaults?, Richard Stallman, 2008/03/08
- deactivation in "shift-select" mode, Miles Bader, 2008/03/07
- Re: deactivation in "shift-select" mode, Chong Yidong, 2008/03/07
- Re: deactivation in "shift-select" mode, Miles Bader, 2008/03/07
- Re: deactivation in "shift-select" mode, Miles Bader, 2008/03/07
- Re: deactivation in "shift-select" mode, Kim F. Storm, 2008/03/08
- Re: position on changing defaults?, Richard Stallman, 2008/03/09
- Re: position on changing defaults?, Miles Bader, 2008/03/09