Re: position on changing defaults?

[Stefan Monnier]

>> AFAICT, the approach I proposed where most/all the movement commands get
>> changed to call a special function in the interactive spec wouldn't
>> suffer from any such problems.  I think it's the best approach so far.

> I can not see what the advantage with an interactive spec over a property on
> the function name is. Could you please tell?

Very simple: no magic, no pre/post-command-hook.


        Stefan