"Jonathan Lange" <address@hidden> writes:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 10:43 PM, Andreas Schwab <address@hidden> wrote:
> > My first impression is that bzr is slow, so slow that it is completely
> > unusable. How can it come that a simple bzr log takes more than a
> > minute to even start? Even cvs log is instantaneous in comparison,
> > although it has to request the log from the server.
> >
>
> As I mentioned in an earlier post, 'bzr log' and 'cvs log' are doing
> very different things. 'bzr log --line' is much closer to typical 'cvs
> log' behaviour.
It is not that close, "cvs log" shows the whole change long for each
entry, not just a single line. For emacs we have very well written
change logs, and if you look at them, you actually want to see the
details.
Is there a fast alternative that shows the whole entry, not just a
single line?