Re: utf-16le vs utf-16-le

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Kenichi Handa <address@hidden>
> Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:17:59 +0900
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
> 
> In article <address@hidden>, Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > Also the encoding that use a BOM should not
> > just ignore the first char, but should only do so if the first char is
> > indeed a BOM.
> 
> I'll fix that soon.

In case it wasn't clear: this problem exists on the release branch
(and in Emacs 22.2).  I didn't try the trunk (didn't have it on the
machine where I found this problem), and from code inspection in
coding.c, it looks like we already do TRT with a BOM that isn't a BOM.
But in Emacs 22.x, the UTF-16 decoder is implemented in CCL, not in C.