[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why `lisp' and `shortlisp'
|
From: |
Glenn Morris |
|
Subject: |
Re: Why `lisp' and `shortlisp' |
|
Date: |
Thu, 03 Jul 2008 21:43:57 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) |
Stefan Monnier wrote:
> That would mean that `shortlisp' doesn't work.
Unless it works well enough for the context of make-docfile, which is
the only place that uses it. Looks like the -d option of make-docfile
is what enables it to work.
I'm only guessing, it's probably all due to...
> So if `shortlisp' always works, why use `lisp'? and if `shortlisp'
> doesn't always work, isn't it a bug to use it?
...hysterical raisins.