Re: Choice of fonts displaying etc/HELLO

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Miles Bader <address@hidden>
> Cc: Kenichi Handa <address@hidden>, address@hidden, address@hidden,
>         address@hidden
> Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 13:54:55 +0900
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> > I meant would it break something if "\\cj" matched only the Katakana
> > and Hiragana characters instead of what it matches today?
> 
> I don't know what it would break, but that doesn't seem like
> particularly intuitive behavior.

??? Why not?

> I think emacs' concept of characters belonging to multiple language
> categories is pretty neat actually.

Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't see how the fact that, say,
Cyrillic characters are claimed to belong to Japanese category could
be considered ``neat''.