Re: [Patch] Behavior of dired when there already is a dired buffer of the same directory

[Miles Bader]

"Antoine Levitt" <address@hidden> writes:
> If I have a dired open on x, do external modifications on the structure of
> x, and rerun dired on x, emacs currently advises me to press g to revert the
> buffer. This is inefficient, and I'd much rather be offered to revert by a
> y/n prompt.

How exactly is typing "y" any more efficient than typing "g"?

[It's certainly the case, though that typing nothing is more efficient
than typing "n"...]

-Miles

-- 
Selfish, adj. Devoid of consideration for the selfishness of others.