[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: composition bug
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
Re: composition bug |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Sep 2008 11:29:55 +0900 |
User-agent: |
SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/23.0.60 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) |
In article <address@hidden>, Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
> > I'm always confused by int and EMACS_INT. "struct it" and
> > "struct text_pos" in dispextern.h uses "int" for
> > buffer/string positions, and xdisp.c calls functions in
> > composite.c with those values. So, there exist mixture of
> > int and EMACS_INT. Shouldn't all of them use EMACS_INT for
> > positions (and perhaps for string length)?
> Yes. It's important for buffers (or strings) larger than 2GB.
> We probably don't need to worry about strings larger than 2GB for a few
> more years, but for buffers it's worthwhile to take it into account.
As I don't have a time to work on it at the moment, I added
this section in admin/FOR-RELEASE.
** In C, use EMACS_INT for variables and structure members
for buffer/string positions. E.g. struct it, struct text_pos.
---
Kenichi Handa
address@hidden
- Re: composition bug, (continued)
- Re: composition bug, Romain Francoise, 2008/09/11
- Re: composition bug, Romain Francoise, 2008/09/13
- Re: composition bug, Kenichi Handa, 2008/09/16
- Re: composition bug, Romain Francoise, 2008/09/16
- Re: composition bug, Kenichi Handa, 2008/09/16
- Re: composition bug, Romain Francoise, 2008/09/16
- Re: composition bug, Kenichi Handa, 2008/09/17
- Re: composition bug, Romain Francoise, 2008/09/17
- Re: composition bug, Kenichi Handa, 2008/09/17
- Re: composition bug, Stefan Monnier, 2008/09/18
- Re: composition bug,
Kenichi Handa <=
- Re: composition bug, Stefan Monnier, 2008/09/18
- Re: composition bug, Kenichi Handa, 2008/09/18