[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Word syntax question
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Word syntax question |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Oct 2008 06:29:21 +0200 |
> From: Miles Bader <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:58:54 +0900
>
> > I agree. I think we should introduce a user option to control whether
> > it stops on script boundaries or not, because sometimes it makes
> > sense, sometimes it doesn't.
>
> But a global setting seems far too course, and in general, whether it's
> "right" or not seems like it depends more on the precise mixture of
> scripts rather than a user's personal preferences.
Not global, buffer-specific. Whether stopping or not on script
boundaries depends on the specific mix of scripts in the buffer.
In addition, perhaps each word-move command should have a way of
overriding that.
- Word syntax question, Miles Bader, 2008/10/21
- Re: Word syntax question, Andreas Schwab, 2008/10/21
- Re: Word syntax question, Miles Bader, 2008/10/21
- Re: Word syntax question, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/10/21
- Re: Word syntax question, Miles Bader, 2008/10/21
- Re: Word syntax question, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/10/21
- Re: Word syntax question, Kenichi Handa, 2008/10/22
- Re: Word syntax question, Kenichi Handa, 2008/10/22
- Re: Word syntax question,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Word syntax question, Miles Bader, 2008/10/22
- Re: Word syntax question, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/10/22
- Re: Word syntax question, Richard M. Stallman, 2008/10/22
- Re: Word syntax question, Richard M. Stallman, 2008/10/22
- Re: Word syntax question, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/10/22
- Re: Word syntax question, Richard M. Stallman, 2008/10/22