Re: image cache

[Miles Bader]

Chong Yidong <address@hidden> writes:
> Note that fixing requires changing all the functions in image.c that
> require a frame argument, so that they use a terminal argument instead.
> Otherwise, if you associate image caches to terminals, you run into
> problems with terminals that have no frame (e.g. terminals created using
> x-open-connection), because you can't supply those image functions with
> a frame argument.

Frameless terminals can't use those functions currently anyway, right?

So one could change the current implementation to put the cache in the
terminal data structure, but preserve the current interfaces.  This
would yield more sharing, without losing functionality.

-Miles

-- 
You can hack anything you want, with TECO and DDT.