Re: Workflow to accumulate individual changes?

[David Kastrup]

"Alfred M. Szmidt" <address@hidden> writes:

>    Still, that seems to me a lesser problem that having to check two
>    places to get all relevant info. And, if you look deep at our
>    ChangeLogs, after years and years of use I'm sure you wouldn't take
>    more than half an hour to find some mistake (I'm not talking about
>    typos, but missing, wrong or duplicate entries, etc.).
>
> That may be true, but it is not a argument to make it impossible to
> fix incorrect entries.  Having proper entries is good for developers,
> and for copyright reasons.

I don't see what "copyright reasons" would make it a good idea to let a
commit+message done by A be silently (or non-silently) be changed by B
at a later date.

-- 
David Kastrup