[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: unit test framework
From: |
Phil Hagelberg |
Subject: |
Re: unit test framework |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:00:08 -0700 |
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 7:56 AM, Lennart Borgman
<address@hidden> wrote:
> I asked long ago for a comparision on EmacsWiki:
>
> http://www.emacswiki.org/cgi-bin/wiki/UnitTesting
>
> However there have not been any interest in that. If have cc:ed the
> unit test framework authors, maybe they want to say something.
>
> I am not sure which of them have signed papers:
>
> ert: Christian Ohler
> elunit: Phil Hagelberg
> elk-test: Nikolaj Schumacher
> etest: Phil Jackson
> el-mock: rubikitch
elunit is deprecated in favour of ert, so it should not be considered
for inclusion. When I was investigating the options (~2 years ago),
ert was the clear winner, though I don't remember the details clearly.
Mostly it had to do with having the clearest failure reports. Beyond
that there were not a lot of differences; unit testing is a pretty
straightforward task.
Things may have changed since then.
-Phil
- unit test framework, Masatake YAMATO, 2010/03/18
- Re: unit test framework, Lennart Borgman, 2010/03/18
- Re: unit test framework, Stefan Monnier, 2010/03/18
- Re: unit test framework, Lennart Borgman, 2010/03/18
- Re: unit test framework, rubikitch, 2010/03/19
- Re: unit test framework,
Phil Hagelberg <=
- Re: unit test framework, Nikolaj Schumacher, 2010/03/20
- Re: unit test framework, joakim, 2010/03/23
- Re: unit test framework, Lennart Borgman, 2010/03/23
- Re: unit test framework, Masatake YAMATO, 2010/03/23
- Re: unit test framework, Stefan Monnier, 2010/03/23
- Re: unit test framework, Philip Jackson, 2010/03/23