[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: `about-emacs' - what about the revno?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: `about-emacs' - what about the revno? |
Date: |
Sat, 28 Aug 2010 18:57:27 +0300 |
> From: "Drew Adams" <address@hidden>
> Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 08:38:15 -0700
>
> When a bug that I filed gets fixed, sometimes the developer who fixes it lets
> me
> know which "revno" it is fixed in. E.g. "This bug is now fixed (revno
> 101110)."
>
> I do not build Emacs myself, and I have no idea what the "revno" corresponds
> to
> or how/where to find it in an existing Emacs build (binary).
>
> When I do `C-h C-a', or when I submit a bug, I see only an identifier like
> this:
>
> GNU Emacs 24.0.50.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600)
> of 2010-08-16 on 3249CTO
>
> If the "revno" is important info for identifying an Emacs build, then perhaps
> we
> should include it in such user-facing info. If not, then perhaps developers
> could refer in some other way (by date?) to the code that contains a given
> fix.
This has come up before, but the discussion was inconclusive (IIRC)
because of 2 reasons:
. revno is not unique: two different branches can have the same
revno for two very different code bases
. revision-id, an alternative method of specifying a revision, _is_
unique, but it's long and a mouthful:
address@hidden
In general, a bugfix should appear in the ChangeLog files with the bug
number, so you should be able to track bugfxes that way.
- `about-emacs' - what about the revno?, Drew Adams, 2010/08/28
- Re: `about-emacs' - what about the revno?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- RE: `about-emacs' - what about the revno?, Drew Adams, 2010/08/28
- Re: `about-emacs' - what about the revno?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/08/28
- Re: `about-emacs' - what about the revno?, Christoph, 2010/08/28
- Re: `about-emacs' - what about the revno?, Teemu Likonen, 2010/08/29
- Re: `about-emacs' - what about the revno?, Stefan Monnier, 2010/08/30