Re: Problems with xml-parse-string

[Chong Yidong]

Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden> writes:

>> Doesn't seem too horrific.
>
> It's not too horrific.  It's just that it's not as nice as it could
> be.  And if you deal with these structures all the time, you get to
> recreate the (and (consp data) (not (eq (car data) '@))) in every
> single branch of every single little trivial function you write (and
> read).

That's why you use `xml-node-children' and so forth.