[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Segfault in current bzr
From: |
grischka |
Subject: |
Re: Segfault in current bzr |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Sep 2010 13:10:23 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) |
> At least that can be avoided without letting go of optimization:
> cf. C-h C-d
>
> ** When you are trying to analyze failed assertions, it will be
> essential to compile Emacs either completely without optimizations or
> at least (when using GCC) with the -fno-crossjumping option. Failure
> to do so may make the compiler recycle the same abort call for all
> assertions in a given function, rendering the stack backtrace useless
> for identifying the specific failed assertion.
Typically emacs: They're rather able to give people a lecture about
gcc options than to add a simple one-line wrapper for abort to print
the file:linenumber.
--- grischka
Re: Segfault in current bzr, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/09/27
Re: Segfault in current bzr,
grischka <=