Re: imagemagick support on W32

[joakim]

Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden> writes:

> On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 13:36,  <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure what the original question was, but I intended for
>> ImageMagick support to live alongside the other image loaders.
>
> OK.
>
>> There is, (imagemagick-types). You dont know for certain at compile time
>> which formats are available, because imagemagick supports a plugin
>> mechanism for new formats.
>
> How does that integrate with image-types and image-type-available-p?

Uhm, aparently not at all? Something must have gotten lost somewhere...

>> so when jpeg
>> support is compiled in, and imagemagick support is compiled in, the jpeg
>> loader wins by default.
>
> Seems sensible.
>
> Thanks for explaining this,
>
>     Juanma

-- 
Joakim Verona