Re: The window-pub branch

[grischka]

martin rudalics wrote:
>  > How can the user override specifiers for buffers that don't match
>  > unambiguous naming conventions (ediff, dired, ...)?
>
> Another user option, say `display-buffer-symbols'?  The application
> would pass a symbol in the call and make sure it has an entry in the
> `display-buffer-specifiers' list  which associates symbols like
> 'other-window with specifiers.   ediff could add entries like 'ediff-A
> and 'ediff-B to `display-buffer-specifiers' and the user, in
> `display-buffer-symbols', could provide an entry to override them.
>
> But I'm not sure how to resolve the conflict when a matching entry can
> be found in both `display-buffer-names' and `display-buffer-symbols'.

A symbol entry is more specific.

However I'd maybe just put names/regexps/symbols in the same
structure.  Such as:

   (setq display-buffer-specifiers '(
      ((a-symbol "*b-name*" (r . "^c-regexp.+"))
        <specifiers>
        )
      ...
    ))

That way the user can express preferences by the order naturally.

> martin