[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bzr vs. git repository
From: |
Frank Schmitt |
Subject: |
Re: bzr vs. git repository |
Date: |
Sat, 01 Jan 2011 11:13:33 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) |
Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> writes:
>>> As you can see, bzr still needs about three times more bandwidth in
>>> both receiving and sending...
>>
>> I don't think this will convince anyone to switch, but frankly, I no
>> longer understand what is all that fuss with git's speed.
>
> I don't want to convince anyone, I just report the issue. You are
> overreacting.
Honestly, as a lurker on this list, I really wonder how many hours of
developer time was spend in the last few years on discussions about
various aspects of version control systems. I don't dare to imagine all
the cool stuff which could have been created if this time has been spend
on software development instead.
--
Have you ever considered how much text can fit in eighty columns? Given that a
signature typically contains up to four lines of text, this space allows you to
attach a tremendous amount of valuable information to your messages. Seize the
opportunity and don't waste your signature on bullshit that nobody cares about.
Re: bzr vs. git repository, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/01/01
Re: bzr vs. git repository, Stefan Monnier, 2011/01/01
Re: bzr vs. git repository, Richard Stallman, 2011/01/01