Re: New function: vc-ediff

[Stefan Monnier]

>> I think vc-ediff should not require any changes to ediff.
>> You can check pcvs.el for an example of code that provides similar
>> functionality without any ediff changes.
> I saw that, but I honestly didn't like this implementation. I felt using
> ediff-buffers' I would need to duplicate code that had already been written,
> namely in `ediff-revision'.

I guess it's OK if Michael likes it.  I happen to think that vc-ediff
should *replace* ediff-revision ;-)


        Stefan