[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Proposed change to nt/INSTALL
|
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
|
Subject: |
Re: Proposed change to nt/INSTALL |
|
Date: |
Thu, 5 May 2011 04:05:28 +0200 |
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 03:47, Ben Key <address@hidden> wrote:
> How about the following?
I think it's quite clear and readable.
Another nitpick (the last one, I promise):
> Note that the directory
> name is enclosed in quotes, not the entire argument.
I would tend to say: "Note that only the directory name [...]".
Juanma
- Re: Bootstrap failure with new configure.bat (was Re: Proposed change to nt/INSTALL), (continued)
- Re: Bootstrap failure with new configure.bat (was Re: Proposed change to nt/INSTALL), Ben Key, 2011/05/06
- Re: Bootstrap failure with new configure.bat (was Re: Proposed change to nt/INSTALL), Christoph Scholtes, 2011/05/06
- Re: Bootstrap failure with new configure.bat (was Re: Proposed change to nt/INSTALL), Ben Key, 2011/05/07
- Re: Bootstrap failure with new configure.bat (was Re: Proposed change to nt/INSTALL), Eli Zaretskii, 2011/05/07
- Re: Bootstrap failure with new configure.bat (was Re: Proposed change to nt/INSTALL), Christoph Scholtes, 2011/05/07
Re: Proposed change to nt/INSTALL, Juanma Barranquero, 2011/05/04