Re: Confusing "bzr log" as result of merges

[Sven Joachim]

On 2011-05-21 11:16 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:

>> From: Sven Joachim <address@hidden>
>> Cc: Andreas Schwab <address@hidden>,  address@hidden
>> Date: Sat, 21 May 2011 11:01:13 +0200
>> 
>> > With bzr, "merge" accepts a switch that can specify revisions to merge.
>> 
>> The downside of that is that bzr then does not track what revisions have
>> already been merged.
>
> And that is downside because...?

Because humans have to do the tracking then, without any help from the
VCS.

Sven