Re: Confusing "bzr log" as result of merges

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Sven Joachim <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden,  address@hidden
> Date: Sat, 21 May 2011 11:27:17 +0200
> 
> >> The downside of that is that bzr then does not track what revisions have
> >> already been merged.
> >
> > And that is downside because...?
> 
> Because humans have to do the tracking then, without any help from the
> VCS.

This revision was already on the trunk, so its other instance doesn't
need to be tracked.