[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: other-buffer advice on kill-buffer
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: other-buffer advice on kill-buffer |
Date: |
Wed, 03 Aug 2011 15:18:39 -0400 |
If it is worth making it advisable, it is worth giving it a hook.
I don't see it that way. Adding a hook is heavier, since it is added
complexity and calls for documentation. By contrast, one less
function that can't effectively be advised is LESS complexity at the
interface level, even though it is a little more complexity in the
code.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use free telephony http://directory.fsf.org/category/tel/
- Re: other-buffer advice on kill-buffer, (continued)
- Re: other-buffer advice on kill-buffer, Tim Cross, 2011/08/01
- Re: other-buffer advice on kill-buffer, Tim Cross, 2011/08/01
- Re: other-buffer advice on kill-buffer, Alp Aker, 2011/08/01
- Re: other-buffer advice on kill-buffer, Jérémy Compostella, 2011/08/02
- Re: other-buffer advice on kill-buffer, Richard Stallman, 2011/08/02
- Re: other-buffer advice on kill-buffer, David Kastrup, 2011/08/03
- Re: other-buffer advice on kill-buffer, Jérémy Compostella, 2011/08/03
- Re: other-buffer advice on kill-buffer, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2011/08/03
- Re: other-buffer advice on kill-buffer,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: other-buffer advice on kill-buffer, Tim Cross, 2011/08/04
- Re: other-buffer advice on kill-buffer, Stefan Monnier, 2011/08/04
- Re: other-buffer advice on kill-buffer, Jérémy Compostella, 2011/08/04
- Re: other-buffer advice on kill-buffer, Leo, 2011/08/19
Re: other-buffer advice on kill-buffer, Chong Yidong, 2011/08/14