[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fundamental mode vs. special mode
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: Fundamental mode vs. special mode |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Oct 2011 15:53:01 +0200 |
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 14:30, Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> wrote:
> "after-change-major-mode-but-before-other-hooks-hook" is a bit wordy
It's still nine chars shorter than
`org-agenda-check-for-timestamp-as-reason-to-ignore-todo-item' ;-)
> so I'm looking for ideas.
Perhaps something like `first-hook-after-new-major-mode-hook'.
Juanma
- Re: Fundamental mode vs. special mode, (continued)
- Re: Fundamental mode vs. special mode, Johan Bockgård, 2011/10/23
- Re: Fundamental mode vs. special mode, Chong Yidong, 2011/10/24
- Re: Fundamental mode vs. special mode, Chong Yidong, 2011/10/24
- Re: Fundamental mode vs. special mode, Stefan Monnier, 2011/10/25
- Re: Fundamental mode vs. special mode,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: Fundamental mode vs. special mode, Paul Eggert, 2011/10/25
- Re: Fundamental mode vs. special mode, Stefan Monnier, 2011/10/25
- Re: Fundamental mode vs. special mode, Alan Mackenzie, 2011/10/25
- Re: Fundamental mode vs. special mode, Chong Yidong, 2011/10/25
- Re: Fundamental mode vs. special mode, Nix, 2011/10/26
- Re: Fundamental mode vs. special mode, Richard Stallman, 2011/10/26
- Re: Fundamental mode vs. special mode, Chong Yidong, 2011/10/26
Re: Fundamental mode vs. special mode, Christoph Scholtes, 2011/10/23