[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3
|
From: |
Chong Yidong |
|
Subject: |
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3 |
|
Date: |
Sat, 29 Oct 2011 17:50:16 +0800 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) |
martin rudalics <address@hidden> writes:
>> More lispy would be make-window-below etc. (Cf make-frame.)
>
> Yes. I'd go for that.
The split-window terminology is too widely used for this. We have tons
of functions and variables named `split-{height|width}-threshold',
`split-window-sensibly', `split-window', `window-splittable-p',
etc. etc. So I don't think it would be wise to give C-x 2 and C-x 3
anything other than names of the form split-window-FOO.
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, (continued)
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, martin rudalics, 2011/10/26
- RE: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Drew Adams, 2011/10/29
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Richard Stallman, 2011/10/29
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, martin rudalics, 2011/10/30
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Richard Stallman, 2011/10/30
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Stefan Monnier, 2011/10/29
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, anerbenartzi, 2011/10/26
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, anerbenartzi, 2011/10/26