[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: C-x 2 and C-x 3
|
From: |
Drew Adams |
|
Subject: |
RE: C-x 2 and C-x 3 |
|
Date: |
Sat, 29 Oct 2011 07:49:11 -0700 |
> > More lispy would be make-window-below etc. (Cf make-frame.)
> Yes. I'd go for that.
Yes, I guess `make-frame' does, like `split-window*', use the current buffer, so
that would be consistent. A good suggestion. Better than my suggestion of
`copy-window-below' etc., because of this consistency.
1+
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Stefan Monnier, 2011/10/29
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, anerbenartzi, 2011/10/26
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, anerbenartzi, 2011/10/26
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, David De La Harpe Golden, 2011/10/26