[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Can we depend on FD_CLOEXEC always being supported?
|
From: |
Daniel Colascione |
|
Subject: |
Can we depend on FD_CLOEXEC always being supported? |
|
Date: |
Sun, 08 Jan 2012 14:46:30 -0800 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 |
Aside from DOS_NT, do we support any platforms without FD_CLOEXEC?
Today, it's only used conditionally in the Emacs code. I don't see
why: FD_CLOEXEC has been standard for a very long time (4.3BSD and
SVr4). Why wouldn't we want to use it unconditionally?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Can we depend on FD_CLOEXEC always being supported?,
Daniel Colascione <=