Re: lexical-binding defined by the caller not the called?

[Pascal J. Bourguignon]

Nic Ferrier <address@hidden> writes:

> "Pascal J. Bourguignon" <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> It fails because lexical-binding is a special variable (in CL terms).
>
> Doh.
>
> That is a really good point.
>
> How do I check for lexical-binding then?

Read again the code I posted along.

-- 
__Pascal Bourguignon__                     http://www.informatimago.com/
A bad day in () is better than a good day in {}.