[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FFI again
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: FFI again |
Date: |
Sun, 06 Oct 2013 14:17:30 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
>> > I really don't like this idea. You either force users to have the Emacs
>> > headers, Emacs import library, and a C compiler available to install a
>> > package or you provide pre-compiled binaries for popular platforms and
>> > create an ABI versioning nightmare.
>> The plan would be to require headers and a C compiler.
>> Precompiled libraries could be considered for the Windows platform, but
>> only if we can keep the versioning nightmare in check.
> I don't think the nightmare is as bad as it sounds. Windows users
> already keep such nightmares in check, including with Emacs.
There's some hope, indeed, but notice that the problem is a bit more
serious than what we currently have for libgnutls and friends, because
that precompiled code needs to link both with lib<foo> and with Emacs,
and there's a potential version mismatch on both sides.
Stefan "still hopeful"
- FFI again, Stefan Monnier, 2013/10/05
- Re: FFI again, joakim, 2013/10/05
- Re: FFI again, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/10/06
- Re: FFI again, Stefan Monnier, 2013/10/06
- Re: FFI again, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/10/07
- Re: FFI again, Stefan Monnier, 2013/10/07
- Re: FFI again, Andy Moreton, 2013/10/07
- Re: FFI again, Stefan Monnier, 2013/10/07
- Re: FFI again, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/10/08
- Re: FFI again, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/10/07
- Re: FFI again, Richard Stallman, 2013/10/07