[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs as word processor
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs as word processor |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Nov 2013 01:01:35 -0500 |
[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider
[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,
[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example.
There are a lot of reactions on this thread that seem somewhat hesitant
about emacs adding WYSIWIG support, but I suspect it's fear that #2 will
corrupt the lisp machine interfaces that we already know and
enjoy... but I doubt that the emacs community would let that happen
anyway.
Lisp is one of the benefits of Emacs that I wish I had when doing
WYSIWIG word processing. To abandon that would defeat the whole point
of this.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone call.
Re: Emacs as word processor, Andreas Röhler, 2013/11/17
Re: Emacs as word processor, Christopher Allan Webber, 2013/11/18
- Re: Emacs as word processor, Tom Tromey, 2013/11/18
- Re: Emacs as word processor,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Emacs as word processor, Andreas Röhler, 2013/11/19
- Re: Emacs as word processor, Jay Belanger, 2013/11/19
- Re: Emacs as word processor, Lennart Borgman, 2013/11/19
- Re: Emacs as word processor, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2013/11/19
- Re: Emacs as word processor, Richard Stallman, 2013/11/20
Re: Emacs as word processor, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/11/19
Re: Emacs as word processor, Karl Voit, 2013/11/22