[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Apologia for bzr
From: |
Jose E. Marchesi |
Subject: |
Re: Apologia for bzr |
Date: |
Tue, 07 Jan 2014 11:30:51 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
> This said, the "what you call a window is called a frame" is not nearly
> as problematic as "what we call window is not what you think", so maybe
> renaming "window" to "pane" would get us most of the benefit.
I think you're right there. If we just get rid of the word
"window", I think that'll fix most confusions. "Pane" and "frame"
are more "technical" terms, and people aren't as apt to make
assumptions about what they mean.
Aren't we underestimating users's natural ability to abstract terms and
concepts? For the average person the "confusion" regarding windows will
least for no more than two minutes, if ever, given that both the
tutorial and the manual explain what a window is...
- Re: Great Old One?, (continued)
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr], Richard Stallman, 2014/01/07
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr], Bob Bobeck, 2014/01/07
- Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr], Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/01/07
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr], Lennart Borgman, 2014/01/07
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr], Yuri Khan, 2014/01/07
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr], Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/01/07
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr], Lennart Borgman, 2014/01/07
- Re: Apologia for bzr,
Jose E. Marchesi <=
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Per Starbäck, 2014/01/09
- RE: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr], Drew Adams, 2014/01/09
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr], Per Starbäck, 2014/01/09
- RE: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr], Drew Adams, 2014/01/09
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr], Per Starbäck, 2014/01/09
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr], David Kastrup, 2014/01/09
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr], Tom, 2014/01/09
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr], David Kastrup, 2014/01/09
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr], Davis Herring, 2014/01/10
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr], David Kastrup, 2014/01/10