Re: Referring to revisions in the git future.

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: David Kastrup <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
> Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 15:35:48 +0100
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> >> From: David Kastrup <address@hidden>
> >> Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 12:00:18 +0100
> >> 
> >> Each commit tends to come with its own manual conflict resolution
> >> for ChangeLog.
> >
> > Not if you have git-merge-changelog installed.
> 
> If it were part of the official workflow

We don't have "the official workflow" for git.  The Powers That Be
claim that it's unnecessary, and even harmful.

I personally find it invaluable, as I do the equivalent bzr plugin.

> it would be part of Emacs or at least ELPA.

It's a C program that is available as a Gnulib module.  Not sure how
that is relevant to ELPA.